Bursting Bubbles of Government Deception

pg9

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.

Galileo Galilei (1564 - 1642)

Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.

Voltaire (1694 - 1778)

Maxims:

If you know not the name of a thing, all knowledge of that thing perishes.

The name is the note of a thing.

pg13

If a demand is made, it rests upon a claim. Meeting the demand means you have accepted the claim. The word

'accept' implies ability to 'reject'. When you reject their claim the demand has no foundation. At that point

the claim has to be either abandoned or defended. Defending a claim means that they, as human beings, have to

use words.

Consent is not the same as assent. It doesn't require a positive affirmation from you. It is just as easily

achieved through your silence as it is through your words.

Denying consent is not all that difficult; all you have to do is give notice and make them aware that he or she

is no longer your representative. You simply fire them and tell them you will exist outside of the legislative

framework. Since they are only allowed to provide service to the public with respect to the legislative

framework, and you are no longer part of that framework, they can no longer lawfully provide you with their

'services'.

pg15

Your signature is evidence of an oath that the instrument upon which it can be found is valid.

Unfortunately we live in a society where you will often be in a position where your signature is demanded

or you can face consequences. You may face a threat of jail or other hardships. Under these situations

you can and should write "Under Duress" before you sign the document. Doing so means your oath is

invalidated. Once you have signed there are things you can write to protect your rights and freedoms.

These are:

Without Prejudice – It means they can't present this document in a court of law.

All Rights Reserved - means you are reserving all your rights. Whatever happens, the rights you had

before signing you still have a solid claim to.

Non-Assumpsit – an Assumpsit is a type of contract, where duties are imposed without full disclosure.

By writing this you ensure that you do not accept any obligations that are not expressly stated.

You can also copyright your name merely by putting a copyright symbol next to your name. ©

If they try using it for any commercial purpose, you can sue them, especially if their commercial activities

harmed you in any way.

Bubble #12 – Show them, don't tell them

Let's say you are stopped by a cop. He asks for your name. You want to ensure you give him that

which identifies the human being and not merely the legal entity. Write it down on a piece of paper like

this: John-Adams: Doe. Use the proper capitalization and punctuation. Remember, that piece of paper is

your property, and he better return it when you ask for it. Also, he will have to put the name in the

computer the way you wrote it and their equipment is not set up for that. If he tries putting in anything but

what you showed him, he is unlawfully trying to create joinder between you and some other person. He

has no right to do that. It also establishes that you are a human being, not a person and he has to play in

that sand box and act as a Peace Officer. Until you show them a Driver's License, they have no right to

act in a Law Enforcement capacity.

pg15

Bubble #12(a) – Identify this!

Officers love to ask you for identification. They make it sound like you are obliged to have it, and

failure to produce it is unlawful. Even if you ask some straight out "Am I obliged to have Identification?"

they will incorrectly answer 'Yes." The argument that one is obliged to have ID falls apart when one looks at

the fact that the only way to get government issued ID is to 'apply' for it. Who's obliged to apply?

The following is from an actual conversation with peace officers engaged in with the author. The first one

was while I was in a park, with a big sign saying "Marijuana sold lawfully here". That apparently got the

police' attention and two came to visit. This recount is by memory.

COP #1: What's your name?

Author: I really wish I could help you, but I do not know if you are acting legally as a Law Enforcement

Officer, or lawfully as a Peace Officer, so I do not know if you want a legal name or a lawful one. Sorry.

COP #1: I am acting legally and I want your legal name.

Author: Do you have proof of claim I have an obligation to have such a thing?

COP #1: Uh.... Um... Fine, then I am acting lawfully and I want your lawful name.

Author: OK, You can call me Rob.

COP #2: What's your last name Rob?

Author: Why do you need that for a lawful discussion? Or are you telling me this is not a lawful discussion

and you are not acting lawfully?

COP #2: I'm acting lawfully! I need your name for my report.

Author: That information will be in MY report. Now What's your full name? I will need it for my report...

COP #2: I don't have to give you my name. I can give you my badge number.

Author: OK I agree to that! And, since equality before and under the law is paramount and we are equal, and

you do not have to give me your name, then clearly I have no obligation to give you mine. I can just give you

MY number, too. Agreed?

COP #1: Oh, and what's your number?

Author: (Smiling) I don't have one. But if I did, I would give it to you.

COP #2: Do you have identification?

Author: Am I obliged to have such a thing?

COP #1: Yes you are!

Author: I looked into that, and found out that the only way to get an ID card was to 'apply' for it. Are you

telling me I am obliged to apply? Do you even know what the word 'apply' means?

COP #1: I'm sure you are going to tell me.

Author: Not unless you intend to pay me.

COP #2: Yeah, right. Like that's going to happen.

Author: Let me ask you this. Are either of you willing to claim under oath and upon your full commercial

liability, that I have a duty or obligation to apply for anything?

COP #1: (Decided this was a good time to silently examine his shoes)

COP #2: (Digging into his pants pocket) Here's a quarter. What does apply mean?

Author: Thank you. It means, to beg, plead, petition, implore, entreat or request. Either of you want to claim

I have an obligation to 'beg'? No? I didn't think so.

COP #2: I am getting tired of this, either you tell me what your name is, or I am arresting you for obstruction

of justice and impeding an investigation.

Author: I thought you were acting lawfully, not legally. So you want to know what my name is?

COP #2: YES!

Author: Fine I will tell you exactly what my name is, but you wont like it...

COP# 1: Just tell us what your name is, will you Rob?

Author: My name is... My name is... My name is ... an intangible security interest and is recognized as such

by the Personal Property Security Act, which governs ALL transactions concerning security interests. That

intangible has immense value, and here you are demanding I just give it to you, with nothing in exchange, no

consideration in return and without knowing what you intend to do with it, or if your actions will devalue it in

any way. Now, are you familiar with the section of the Criminal Code of Canada relating to the offence of

extortion? You really should be up on that. (Looking at nonexistent watch) You know, this might be a good

time to exercise one of my other favorite rights, the right to travel. I think I will travel over there somewhere.

You guys have a great day, eh?

In this next little discussion, I was sitting at a patio, doing what many authors do. (It involves beer.) A paddy

wagon had pulled up and a man had written on it with a felt tip marker "VDP are Pigs!" He got arrested and

became quite belligerent and hostile. I calmed him down and did so with respect for the officers. They are

human beings, after all. They came over later and offered their thanks and once again asked for information.

This was the exchange.

COP: What's your last name?

Author: I'm sorry, I wish I could help you, but I don't have one of those.

COP: HUH? What do you mean?

Author: I don't have a 'last' name.

COP: What do you have?

Author: Hemorrhoids. Just teasing. I have a family name.

COP: (chuckling) OK, what's your family name?

Author: Menard.

COP: OK, and what's your first name?

Author: I'm really sorry, I wish I could help you, but I honestly don't have one of those.

COP: Oh, and what do you have?

Author: (smiling) I have given Christian names!

COP: And what might they be?

Author: They might be anything.

COP: (laughing) What are they?

Author: Robert and Arthur

COP: In that order?

Author: You know I don't mean any disrespect, but you have an awful lot of questions. This would go much

quicker if you'd just ask the proper questions. Yes, in that order.

COP: And what's your date of birth?

Author: I really wish I could help you there, but swear to God, I was not counting then. (BIG smile) Honest.

COP: (Laughing) Fair enough. (Slyly) So when do you celebrate your Birth day?

Author: (Big Smile) I do that every single day!

COP: Let me put it this way, if I wanted to send you a gift for your birthday, when should I send it?

Author: You should do that tomorrow! Get me something BIG too; you have been remiss.

COP: I am not getting that information am I?

Author: I am not a psychic. I know I cannot and thus will not provide you with what you seek. I do wish

you well though.

COP: Well, I don't have the time. It was nice meeting you, but unfortunately, although I can include your

name in my report, we won't know who you really are.

Author: Trust me Officer; your superiors know exactly who I am. They love me, even. (Smiling)

Cop: I'm sure they do. It was nice meeting you, thanks for your help.

Police need TWO things; name and date of birth. It is those two things which define a person and with

which they can claim the existence of one. You can distinguish between a legal and lawful name and

provide ONLY the lawful one. You can also refuse to give a date of birth, as there is no way they can claim

this is information you know as FACT. Any information you have is merely the result of hearsay, or is

merely custom and NOT backed by any affidavit you have ever seen. So how can you really know when you

were born? As a human being, you simply can't!

If you take the steps found in this book, they can never get you to agree that you are a person, only that

you are acting as an agent for a person. They are not the government; they are only agents for the

government. You are not a person; you are merely an agent for a person. Two can play their game.

pg18

Matthew 5:25 - Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the

adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison.

Luke 12:58 - When thou goest with thine adversary to the magistrate, as thou art in the way, give diligence

that thou mayest be delivered from him; lest he hale thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the

officer, and the officer cast thee into prison.

In order to register you will have to hand over the MSO or Manufacturers Statement or Origin or the

MNVIS (Manufacturers New Vehicle Information Statement). They then give you a Certificate of

Ownership with two names on it; yours and theirs. Now they are part owner of that 'motor vehicle' and you

never even had to register it in the first place!

Equality before and under the Law is paramount.

Conflict is avoidable, unnecessary, and undesirable and when it raises its ugly head is to be dealt with

using discussion, negotiation and then if necessary, adjudication in a court of competent jurisdiction.

pg19

If you can understand this, you can use it to seize power. The government is not big on discussing and

will try to get you into court without discussing or negotiating. If they succeed, you end up looking like you

abandoned the rule of law. You will be the one apparently in dishonour. By understanding this concept, you

can force them to discuss matters with you before going to court. If you are in agreement with him or her,

there can be no controversy or conflict; therefore the Court has no power, because it is a place for those in

conflict. If they refuse to discuss with you and try to drag you into court without benefit of discussion and

negotiation, they have abandoned the rule of law and you merely have to show that they are in dishonour. If

there is conflict, almost always someone is in dishonour. When two people are both acting honourably,

conflict is very unlikely. Your goal in court, should you be unable to avoid it, is to ensure you are not the one

in dishonour. Clearly embracing the rule of law and striving to avoid the conflict accomplish this.

Imagine you have two kids playing in the back yard and then suddenly you hear a big brouhaha. You

go investigate and find one child with muddy hands and the other with mud all down his back. Who is likely

to blame for the conflict? Clearly the one with the clean hands did not engage in mud flinging therefore they

are in honour.